<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservatives Front New Copyright Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecorch.com/politics/conservatives-front-new-copyright-bill/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecorch.com/politics/conservatives-front-new-copyright-bill</link>
	<description>The personal website of Keith Little.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thecorch.com &#187; Copyright Reform Headed Way of Dodo</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorch.com/politics/conservatives-front-new-copyright-bill/comment-page-1#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>thecorch.com &#187; Copyright Reform Headed Way of Dodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorch.com/?p=560#comment-620</guid>
		<description>[...] little over a month ago I warned you of the upcoming copyright reform proposed by our politicians. I warned you that it imposes certain restrictions on how you own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little over a month ago I warned you of the upcoming copyright reform proposed by our politicians. I warned you that it imposes certain restrictions on how you own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorch.com/politics/conservatives-front-new-copyright-bill/comment-page-1#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorch.com/?p=560#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Soon you&#039;ll have a wife whose salary depends on laws that protect the rights of those who create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon you&#8217;ll have a wife whose salary depends on laws that protect the rights of those who create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorch.com/politics/conservatives-front-new-copyright-bill/comment-page-1#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorch.com/?p=560#comment-318</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re forgetting something else to take into account here.

Copyright bills were put forward in both 2005 and 2008 and both were horrible.  Do you know what happened?  They weren&#039;t quite put on the backburner, they died when parliament died.  I&#039;d say these bills are a great tool for Canadian politicians to appear tough on these issues to get the American media companies off their backs, but then before they get a chance to pass just dissolve parliament, and it&#039;s gone.  Said American companies don&#039;t pay enough attention to Canadian politics to really notice this, and you don&#039;t piss off the Canadians too much because you don&#039;t actually do anything.  I think we should all be on the lookout for an election coming soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re forgetting something else to take into account here.</p>
<p>Copyright bills were put forward in both 2005 and 2008 and both were horrible.  Do you know what happened?  They weren&#8217;t quite put on the backburner, they died when parliament died.  I&#8217;d say these bills are a great tool for Canadian politicians to appear tough on these issues to get the American media companies off their backs, but then before they get a chance to pass just dissolve parliament, and it&#8217;s gone.  Said American companies don&#8217;t pay enough attention to Canadian politics to really notice this, and you don&#8217;t piss off the Canadians too much because you don&#8217;t actually do anything.  I think we should all be on the lookout for an election coming soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theluketaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.thecorch.com/politics/conservatives-front-new-copyright-bill/comment-page-1#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>theluketaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecorch.com/?p=560#comment-315</guid>
		<description>The digital locks kill any improvements this bill has.  They make it impossible to enforce copyright limits since the encryption doesn&#039;t expire with the copyright.  They leave consumers beholden to the right management system provider as in the case of Walmart shutting down their DRM servers.  Anyone who bought music from them could no longer access their songs without breaking the digital lock.  With these legal protections digital locks make it possible for companies to sell us back the rights we otherwise have using even the most simplistic lock.  This is already happening in several cases but the worst one is Rogers who encrypts their digital cable.  This means recording it with a PVR requires their permission.  Rogers charges a monthly fee for that permission.  Under this law time shifting is explicitly permitted except when doing so would break a digital lock so Rogers will have carte blanche to go on charging their monthly fee.

It wouldn&#039;t take a major change to fix the problem.  All that&#039;s really needed is a provision that makes breaking a digital lock legal when used for the lawful purposes spelled out in the rest of the bill.  Such a change would mean the bill was still WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) compatible and stop corporate rights from trumping personal ones.  Entertainment companies would still be able to aggressively go after those who make copies available since that isn&#039;t permitted anywhere in this bill.

There are already several provisions that allow breaking digital locks, including for encryption research, the perception impaired, computer security (thank you Sony), loss of personal information (again thank you Sony) and software interoperability.  It seems pretty reasonable to add device, format and time shifting and backups to that list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The digital locks kill any improvements this bill has.  They make it impossible to enforce copyright limits since the encryption doesn&#8217;t expire with the copyright.  They leave consumers beholden to the right management system provider as in the case of Walmart shutting down their DRM servers.  Anyone who bought music from them could no longer access their songs without breaking the digital lock.  With these legal protections digital locks make it possible for companies to sell us back the rights we otherwise have using even the most simplistic lock.  This is already happening in several cases but the worst one is Rogers who encrypts their digital cable.  This means recording it with a PVR requires their permission.  Rogers charges a monthly fee for that permission.  Under this law time shifting is explicitly permitted except when doing so would break a digital lock so Rogers will have carte blanche to go on charging their monthly fee.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t take a major change to fix the problem.  All that&#8217;s really needed is a provision that makes breaking a digital lock legal when used for the lawful purposes spelled out in the rest of the bill.  Such a change would mean the bill was still WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) compatible and stop corporate rights from trumping personal ones.  Entertainment companies would still be able to aggressively go after those who make copies available since that isn&#8217;t permitted anywhere in this bill.</p>
<p>There are already several provisions that allow breaking digital locks, including for encryption research, the perception impaired, computer security (thank you Sony), loss of personal information (again thank you Sony) and software interoperability.  It seems pretty reasonable to add device, format and time shifting and backups to that list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

